Perhaps the biggest one is that you are coaching a real pupil, but you do have the examiner sitting in the back. So rather than the examiner being part of the process as they were with the PST’s they are now observers of the process. An immediate consequence of this is an increase in pressure on the PDI.
Basic knowledge of your subject and its application which used to be assessed on Part 3 under the old PST system is now no longer done. Decent trainers will of course make sure it is done, but it is not tested as it would have been under the old PST system.
A stage is missed out, meaning a PDIs standard of knowledge of driving as tested is now not much greater than what is required for a learner. You might say the ADI 21T still makes this requirement of going over the subjects as it has not changed since the PST days.
But how often do you hear people saying that the ADI 21T is completely outdated? As an industry are we happy with the fact there is not much difference between a learners theory test and a PDIs theory test?
The next biggest difference might be that with the old PST’s the role playing examiner was choosing the route and managing the risk, this is now done by PDI. This effectively means that PDIs must be moving and managing the route. Your choice of route is now crucial. Too easy or difficult and the pupil is not learning.
The marking has changed from knowledge of your subject to your skill in imparting it and making it stick with the pupil. This has meant that rather than telling a pupil you are now so long as it is safe, asking. A simple way of looking at it is:
- Where does the pupil need help and what do they need to know?
- Is it safe?
- Are they learning something?
Share This: